External management API lacks authorization
Authenticated low-privileged callers can create a group mapping that gives their identity registry administrator access.
Two flaws in the open-source mcp-gateway-registry let a low-privileged authenticated user obtain registry admin rights and let a user with server-write permissions send internal requests. Upgrade to 1.35.0 or later and audit stored configuration.
AWS disclosed two issues in deployments of the open-source mcp-gateway-registry. CVE-2026-100307 (GHSA-rxf3-qgpv-wxvr) affects 1.0.9 through 1.24.7. An authenticated low-privileged caller can use the management API to map an identity-provider group to a privileged scope. Version 1.25.0 enforces authorization when these endpoints write changes. Existing mappings remain active until reviewed and removed, and the upgrade does not invalidate any credentials already read.
CVE-2026-125926 (GHSA-fc39-fwh3-wv5r) affects 1.0.3 through 1.34.0. An authenticated user who can register or change a server can point its upstream address at services reachable from the gateway. Depending on network configuration and response handling, the path can expose internal data or cloud metadata credentials. Version 1.35.0 validates new or changed addresses and leaves existing configuration in place. Upgrade, audit historical state and confirm that management routes and outbound connections are restricted.
Authenticated low-privileged callers can create a group mapping that gives their identity registry administrator access.
An authenticated caller with server registration or modification rights can send requests to internal destinations and may read the responses.
| Product | Safe from | Note |
|---|---|---|
| mcp-gateway-registry (both CVEs) | 1.35.0 |
Nov 11, 20:30 UTC
AWS discloses management API privilege escalation
The advisory identifies 1.25.0 as the first fix and calls for an audit of existing grants and credentials.
Nov 11, 21:00 UTC
AWS discloses a separate server-side request forgery flaw
The advisory identifies 1.35.0 as the first fix and calls for a review of stored upstream URLs.
We list each claim and who made it. Primary sources (the vendor, the researcher, the registry) are marked. Where reports disagree, we grade by the worst credible case.